Psychiatr News February 2, 2007
Volume 42, Number 3, page 1
© 2007 American Psychiatric Association
Symptoms Linger Years Later for Terror Victims
Aaron Levin
Survivors of the 1995 Oklahoma City federal building bombing may not show
psychiatric symptoms, but their hearts show that the impact of the terrorist
act is still with them.
Seven years after the Oklahoma City federal-building bombing, blood
pressure and heart rates still rose among apparently healthy survivors when
they were reminded of the 1995 blast.
"These were selectively healthy people, not on heart or blood
pressure medications or psychotropics, but they were still more physically
responsive than a comparison group," said Phebe Tucker, M.D., a
professor of psychiatry and director of the Anxiety Disorders Clinic at the
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center in Oklahoma City.
"These people assume they're OK, but you have to look at other things
like what their hearts are doing to see the health consequences," said
Tucker in an interview with Psychiatric News.
"This study shows that traumatic events are not simply psychological
in nature but also have physiological consequences," said Frank Putnam,
M.D., a professor of pediatrics and psychiatry and director of the Mayerson
Center for Safe and Healthy Children at the Cincinnati Children's Hospital
Medical Center, in an interview. "The body is still keeping score even
though they think they've moved on."
Half the people in the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building were killed by the
explosion, and many of the rest were injured. Tucker was on duty that April
19, when Timothy McVeigh set off the bomb in downtown Oklahoma City, and
helped treat survivors at the local Veterans Affairs hospital.
Tucker and her colleagues evaluated 60 survivors out of a group of 113 who
had been studied shortly after the event by Tucker's co-author Carol North,
M.D., M.P.E., now a professor of psychiatry at the University of Texas
Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas. Besides not using cardiovascular or
psychiatric medications, the subjects in the current study could have no
untreated or unstable medical illness that might have biased physiological
measurements. Among those survivors meeting the selection criteria, 84 percent
had been injured in the blast, and 27 percent of them required
hospitalization. About 96 percent said they had recovered or nearly recovered
from any effects of the bombing.
Tucker, North, and colleagues compared these 60 with an equal number of
age- and gender-matched individuals in the Oklahoma City area who were not
near the explosion, did not have friends or relatives at the site, and weren't
involved in rescue or recovery efforts.
The researchers measured heart rate and systolic, diastolic, and mean
arterial blood pressure in each subject before, during, and after a
semistructured interview about the bombing. Next, they administered four
psychometric tests to evaluate posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms:
the DSM-IV version of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS), the
DIS Disaster Supplement Interview and Questionnaire, the Beck Depressive
Inventory, and the Impact of Event Scale–Revised.
"While some findings have been identified before, this study benefits
from being a fairly large sample of a resilient, nonclinical population who
experienced a single, well-defined event and follow-up period," said
Putnam.
Nine of the survivors and one of the control subjects had current PTSD.
Seven other survivors had PTSD and comorbid symptoms. Overall, more
psychiatric symptoms were found among the survivors than the controls, wrote
the researchers in the February American Journal of Psychiatry, but
"survivors nonetheless had low levels of PTSD symptoms and a low rate of
PTSD diagnosis, which suggests they either were resilient or had experienced
emotional healing over time."
Both groups of subjects had similar baseline blood-pressure readings,
although the survivors had higher pretest heart rates (72.89 beats per minute
on average) than the comparison group (68.20). Both of these measures rose
significantly for survivors during the discussion of the bombing incident.
Their reaction was independent of their PTSD symptoms.
"These results suggest that the residue of trauma exposure may
persist less in narrative ratings of emotional effects than in physiologic
differences that may be independent of the pathophysiology of PTSD," the
researchers said.
"Tucker and colleagues have added to the literature on the
physiologic burden carried by those with PTSD and perhaps also those exposed
to extreme trauma who do not reach diagnostic levels," Robert Ursano,
M.D., told Psychiatric News. Ursano is a professor and chair of the
Department of Psychiatry and director of the Center for the Study of Traumatic
Stress at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in
Bethesda, Md.
"Other studies that related long-term PTSD to increased risk of
cardiac disease and stroke also continue to indicate the need for further
study of the long-term health burden of severe traumatic events across the
health, illness, and disease spectrum," he said.
Tucker hopes to continue following her subjects. The physiological effects
she has observed may harm or help the survivors, she said. Some, especially
those with incipient cardiovascular problems, might someday feel the effects
that Ursano suggested. Others might find that their heightened reactivity
could help them avoid or survive future dangers, said Tucker.
"We have to remember, these exaggerated responses are not just
occurring in the lab but also in daily life, prompted by reminders,"
said Putnam. "Traumatic events ought to be part of their medical
history." 
Get information about faster international access.
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2007
American Psychiatric Association.
All rights reserved.
Home
| Search
| Current Issue
| Past Issues
| Subscribe
| All APPI Journals
| Help
| Contact Us
| 
