
Psychiatr News June 15, 2007
Volume 42, Number 12, page 13
© 2007 American Psychiatric Association
Challenges May Be Daunting, But APA Helps Meet Them
Abigail Donovan, M.D.
Abigail Donovan, M.D., is a first-year child and adolescent psychiatry
fellow at the Massachusetts General Hospital and McLean Hospital combined
program.
This is a difficult time to be a psychiatrist, and especially a
psychiatrist in training. Over the past year, the field of psychiatry has
witnessed many controversies and dilemmas. Medicare changes have complicated
our patients' already complex lives. Many of our patients suffered an
exacerbation of their symptoms, not through the natural course of illness, but
through changes in medication mandated by their insurance.
There has been national media attention about "overmedicating"
and "overdiagnosing" children with mental illness. At the same
time, there are editorials about insufficient mental health treatment for
youth, especially in the wake of national tragedies such as the massacre at
Virginia Tech.
And while the media direct attention to the prescribing practices of
psychiatrists, there are bills in state legislatures to allow psychologists to
prescribe many of the same medications that psychiatrists do but with
significantly less training. And despite public outcry about access to
psychiatric services, mental health insurance parity is not yet a reality.
What is a young psychiatrist to think?
As a psychiatrist in training, I find myself feeling anxious about
practicing in a field with so much controversy and so many paradoxes of such
great importance. I have never questioned becoming a psychiatristI know
that I could do nothing else as fulfilling in my life; however, I am acutely
aware of the challenges inherent to psychiatry, especially in the current
political and social milieu. I worry about how to provide the best care for my
patients within the constraints of inadequate mental health care insurance
coverage. I worry about how the people who never reach my office will find
mental health care, given the challenges of access. I worry about how the
veterans returning from overseas will obtain appropriate mental health care
for themselves and their families. I worry about the influence that the
pharmaceutical industry has over psychiatric research and the comparatively
scarce government funding as an alternative means for this research. And when
I think that I have finally identified all of the important issues, a new
editorial is published, new headline-making news is announced, a new question
emerges.
In my residency, there is a mantra, repeated often throughout training,
from the most senior faculty down to the intern class: "never worry
alone."
We are taught that if you ever feel worried about a patient, a decision, a
treatment, you should consult a supervisor to discuss the issue. I have made
use of this opportunity on many occasions, even paging supervisors in the
middle of the night to discuss a particularly difficult case. I am comfortable
admitting that I am a worrier; in fact, I am quite accomplished at worrying.
But the experience is much more tolerable when there is someone else to worry
with you. Hence, my supervisors have grown accustomed to hearing my voice in
the middle of the night: "Sorry to wake you, Dr. Prager, it's me
again...."
But who is there to worry with me about the state of mental health care in
the United States? About access to psychiatric care? About all of the many
complex issues the field of psychiatry is facing?
Until last year, I did not have an answer for these questions. Then, in May
2006, I began my term as the member-in-training trustee-elect on the APA Board
of Trustees.
And over the past year I have realized that not only is APA acutely aware
of the myriad difficult issues facing psychiatry today, but also that APA is
actively working to address these issues.
Under the ambitious leadership of Dr. Pedro Ruiz, who just completed his
year as APA president, APA has worked tirelessly to analyze barriers to
psychiatric treatment and improve access to care, to advocate strongly for
mental health care insurance parity, to address the mental health care needs
of returning veterans, to fight psychologist-prescribing privileges, and to
promote collaboration between other powerful organizations with similar
goals.
In addition, APA is working to further the field as a whole, through
revising its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual and by offering
numerous fellowships, research grants, mentorship programs, and comprehensive
practice guidelines for members-in-training and for more experienced
psychiatrists. As a member of APA, I have come to realize that I no longer
worry alone. In fact, APA has even gone a step farther than being alert to
these issues; it is committed to resolving them.
Get information about faster international access.
a>
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2007
American Psychiatric Association.
All rights reserved.
Home
| Search
| Current Issue
| Past Issues
| Subscribe
| All APPI Journals
| Help
| Contact Us
|