Psychiatr News December 15, 2006
Volume 41, Number 24, page 25
© 2006 American Psychiatric Association
It May Be Time to Rethink Bipolar Classification in Youth
Aaron Levin
Three forms of bipolar disorder appearing in children and adolescents may
be a single entity rather than separate disorders.
Various manifestations of childhood bipolar disorder, even those that don't
meet full DSM-IV diagnostic criteria, are part of broader continuum
of bipolar illness, according to a study of more than 400 children and
adolescents.
The Course and Outcome of Bipolar Youth (COBY) study compared similarities
and differences among subjects with bipolar disorder I (BP-I), bipolar
disorder II (BP-II), and bipolar disorder not otherwise specified
(BP-NOS).
David Axelson, M.D., an assistant professor of psychiatry at Western
Psychiatric Institute and Clinic at the University of Pittsburgh Medical
Center, and colleagues recruited 438 children and adolescents aged 7 to 17
years, 11 months (mean, 12.7 years) at medical centers at Brown University,
the University of California at Los Angeles, and the University of
Pittsburgh.
The subjects met DSM-IV criteria for BP-I or BP-II, or for the
investigators' standards for BP-NOS. Those BP-NOS standards applied to
subjects who lacked at least one required symptom, did not have a major
depressive episode, or had a sufficient number and types of manic symptoms the
duration of which fell short of DSM-IV criteria.
"BP-NOS in the DSM-IV is an extremely broad definition that
is useful in clinical work because it predicts response in the future course
of the illness," said Barbara Gracious, M.D., director of the Laboratory
for Mood Disorders in Children and Adolescents and director of child and
adolescent psychiatry and assistant professor of psychiatry, obstetrics and
gynecology, and pediatrics at the University of Rochester Medical Center.
"But for research, you need more specific criteria. Spelling those out
in the study allows other psychiatrists to compare them with their own
patients."
The question facing the COBY researchers, Gracious told Psychiatric
News, is "whether these are different but related disorders or are
they manifestations of different points in the development of the
disease?"
Study participants were evaluated with elements of the Schedule for
Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children (KSADS) in
semistructured interviews and by interviewing the child's primary caregiver
about the caregiver's psychiatric history as well as that of the subject's
first- and second-degree relatives.
About 58 percent of the children met criteria for BP-I, 7 percent for
BP-II, and 35 percent for BP-NOS. Subjects with BP-NOS had lower rates of
lifetime history of psychosis, psychiatric hospitalization, psychotropic
medication treatment, and suicide attempts than did those with BP-I. Subjects
with BP-I had more of the seven DSM-IV criteria for manic or
hypomanic episodes, at mild or higher severity, and had higher KSADS Manic
Rating Scale scores than those with BP-NOS.
"During the most serious lifetime episode of manic symptoms, subjects
with BP-I on average met one more DSM-IV manic symptom criterion
compared with subjects with BP-NOS," wrote Axelson and colleagues.
"The symptoms were more intense, and functional impairment was more
severe in the BP-I group."
However, youth with BP-NOS and those with BP-I shared similar age of onset,
duration of illness, rates of comorbid diagnoses and prior major depressive
episodes, family-history characteristics, and types of manic symptoms that
were present during the most serious lifetime episode.
There were "few detectable differences" between participants
with BP-II and those with BP-I and BP-NOS.
The primary reason that patients with BP-NOS did not achieve full
diagnostic status was because they did not meet DSM-IV duration
criteria. Those criteria call for seven consecutive days of manic symptoms in
a manic or mixed episode or four consecutive days for a hypomanic episode.
"Most children and adolescents with BP-NOS have similar, albeit less
severe, presentations as youth with BP-I disorder and have similar comorbidity
and family histories," they said. These similarities indicate that
BP-NOS reflects a phenotype on the same continuum as BP-I among young
people.
The COBY researchers are continuing to follow their subjects. Their
preliminary observations indicate that many subjects with BP-NOS eventually
meet DSM-IV standards for BP-I.
Some BP-NOS patients may progress to BP-I or BP-II, some may not change
much, and some may have depression and conduct problems, said Gracious.
Axelson's study was an important step forward, but only further genetic
studies will tease out the differences, because bipolar disorders are not
single-gene diseases, she said.
"This kind of research is extremely important for child psychiatry,
but it's hard to get funding and hard to keep the patient population,"
said Gracious. "Bipolar disorder in children wasn't even discussed until
the 1990s. Studies that began then are only now starting to report results.
You need a 15- to 20-year follow-up, but foundations and NIMH don't work that
way. Researchers need to reapply for grants every two or three
years."
Still, she is hopeful that the mechanisms of bipolar disorder will become
better known and that treatment, and possibly even prevention, will advance to
permit these young patients to lead functional lives.
The COBY study was supported by the National Institute of Mental
Health.
"Phenomenology of Children and Adolescents With Bipolar
Spectrum Disorders" is posted at
<http://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/63/10/1139>.
Get information about faster international access.
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2006
American Psychiatric Association.
All rights reserved.
Home
| Search
| Current Issue
| Past Issues
| Subscribe
| All APPI Journals
| Help
| Contact Us
| 
