Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Lloyd, R. A. Search for Related Content

Medical Ethics

Fayetteville, Ark.

In his letter in the September 1 issue, John Bezirganian, M.D., takes the position that "[p]eople who want doctors not to take part in the death penalty on `medical ethics' grounds are simply using a ploy to force their moral beliefs on the majority."

First, to merely "want" something does not force anything on anybody. Second, ethics and morality are intrinsically related to each other. Ethics can be defined as "a system or code of morals," while morality is defined as "principles of right and wrong in conduct; ethics." Who among us would advocate an ethical position that we believe to be immoral? Does this intrinsic relationship make advocacy of an ethical position into a "ploy"?

Either Dr. Bezirganian is doing exactly what he accuses others of doing (that is, advocating an ethical position that reflects his moral beliefs) or he is advocating an ethical position that he believes to be immoral! I suspect that the first alternative is correct, but in either case, he undermines his own argument.

Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Lloyd, R. A. Search for Related Content

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2006 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us