
Psychiatr News August 18, 2006
Volume 41, Number 16, page 21
© 2006 American Psychiatric Association
Has Schizophrenia Evolved Into Less Serious Illness?
Mark Moran
Emil Kraepelin and forebears described a very high degree of phenotypic
diversity in schizophrenia patients, with reproductive capacity varying
inversely with phenotypic severity.
| |
Thomas McGlashan, M.D., observes that recovery is an expectable goal for
many patients with schizophrenia today, unlike decades ago. Michael Marsland /
Yale University
|
|
Is the schizophrenia typically seen by clinicians today milder than the
disease described by Emil Kraepelin in the 19th century or even that commonly
seen by clinicians in the middle of the 20th?
And might natural selection be at work, progressively thinning the
population of the most sorely affected patients while allowing a less-severe
form of disease to survive into our day?
That's the intriguing idea floated by Thomas McGlashan, M.D., in an
editorial in the July Schizophrenia Bulletin.
In an interview with Psychiatric News, McGlashan acknowledged that
the notion hardly occurs to clinicians busy treating a disease no one would
describe as mild. And credible research comparing the disease as it presented
100 years ago with today's malady is nonexistent.
But McGlashan suggests it may be reasonable for contemporary researchers
and clinicians to look up, so to speak, from their work and ponder why it is
that "recovery" is advanced as an expectable goal for many
patients today, when 60 years ago such a notion would never have been
considered.
He noted that the subjective experience of clinicians whose careers have
spanned several decades seems to confirm that the severity of schizophrenia
has ameliorated over the years.
"The question occasionally comes up with older colleagues about how
many catatonic patients they've seen recently," McGlashan said.
"And the answer is that we haven't seen any, or any of the really
deteriorating cases that as a medical student I can recall seeing in the early
1960s. I can remember some of us had a trip to a state hospital then and went
to the infamous building where they had the worst cases. They were really
vegetative and scary, and even though they were medicatedthis was in
the early days of antipsychotic medication, and all of them were on
Thorazinethey were often mute."
Remembering Different Disorder
Those impressions are bolstered by writings from Kraepelin on describing a
schizophrenia that might seem to be a thing of the past. In his editorial,
McGlashan cites two clinicians writing in the 1970s and 1980s who remember
seeing a different disease earlier in their career.
"I believe that schizophrenic illnesses today are milder and that one
rarely sees patients experiencing an acute, unremitting catastrophic
course," wrote John Romano, M.D., in the Bulletin in 1977.
And in 1987 John Ellard, M.D., writing in the Australian-New Zealand
Journal of Psychiatry, concluded a reminiscence about 40 years of
treating schizophrenia with the remarkable comment: "Whereas then my
patient and I struggled to communicate at all, now we are likely to finish up
discussing the dopamine hypothesis."
Better treatment, including release from the back wards of state hospitals,
surely has contributed to the impression that patients are less severely ill.
But McGlashan believes it is possible that natural selection is at work.
Is Schizophrenia Recent Phenomenon?
It is a notion that is overlooked, he said, in part because it implies that
schizophrenia is a relatively recent phenomenon. That theory, and the
possibility that schizophrenia may not have existed before the 17th century,
has been advanced by schizophrenia researcher Fuller Torrey, M.D., in The
Invisible Plague (Rutgers University Press, 2001). Moreover, most people
are accustomed to thinking of natural selection as a process that occurs over
many centuries, rather than over one or two.
But McGlashan believes there may be something to Torrey's theory and
compelling reasons for considering natural selection as one cause for the
amelioration of the disease: a very high degree of phenotypic diversity is
described by Kraepelin and his forebears, and it may be that reproductive
capacity varies inversely with phenotypic severity.
As he writes in the Bulletin, "If such a process were
active, we would expect to see a marked reduction in the reproductive capacity
of those afflicted and to see selection against the most debilitating forms of
the disorder. The former has been documented many times, and the latter
appears to match the longitudinal data."
McGlashan told Psychiatric News that he is currently working with
Danish researchers to look at the reproductive capacity of patients and their
family members. Preliminary research confirms existing data: patients with
schizophrenia from the latter decades of the 20th century produced fewer
children than the general population.
The idea that schizophrenia is a relatively recent phenomenon, a genetic
predisposition that has blossomed into disease in the industrial and
postindustrial environment of the last two-and-a-half centuries, is more than
a midsummer fancy. For it implies new avenues for thinking about
pathophysiology of the disease, something McGlashan believes is long
overdue.
"We need to start thinking about schizophrenia in ways other than
dopamine metabolism," he said. "That theory has generated a lot of
reasonably good treatments, but it's not getting us much further. We are
spending a lot of time and money trying to tweak that system, and I think we
have reached a stage of diminishing returns."
"At Issue: Is Natural Selection Rendering Schizophrenia Less
Severe?" is posted at
<http://schizophreniabulletin.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/32/3/428#BIB17>.
Get information about faster international access.
a>
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2006
American Psychiatric Association.
All rights reserved.
Home
| Search
| Current Issue
| Past Issues
| Subscribe
| All APPI Journals
| Help
| Contact Us
|