
Psychiatr News August 18, 2006
Volume 41, Number 16, page 13
© 2006 American Psychiatric Association
Are Payment Cuts Driving Physicians From Medicare?
Rich Daly
While the GAO finds that the number of physicians who are Medicare
providers is rising, some question whether the trend is true for
psychiatrists.
As APA and other physician organizations build momentum on Capitol Hill to
halt the latest scheduled cut to Medicare payments to physicians, new research
questions whether reduced or stagnating reimbursements have had much impact on
physicians' willingness to participate in the program.
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported in late July that its
study of physician participation in the Medicare program following the reduced
and stagnant reimbursements allowed under the program in recent years
indicated that few physicians stopped participating. Moreover, said the GAO,
there was little evidence to suggest that beneficiaries had difficulty
accessing care.
The study was mandated by the 2003 Medicare reform law after the Medicare
physician fee formula underwent a 5.4 percent reduction to help moderate rapid
spending increases. APA and other physician advocacy organizations have long
been concerned that inadequate reimbursements cause physicians to drop out of
the Medicare program, thereby hurting seniors' access to care.
Physicians Not Deterred
The GAO study, which used records and surveys compiled by the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), found that the number of physicians
billing Medicare for services and the proportion of services for which
Medicare's fees were accepted as payment in full increased during the study
period, from April 2000 to April 2005. Less than 4 percent of physicians said
that they did not accept any new Medicare patients in that time.
In addition, the use of physician services generally increased nationwide
in the study period. According to the AMA, however, this finding should not be
interpreted as an improvement in access. Increases in the use of physician
services could result from beneficiaries' growing sicker, the substitution of
physician services for care in the hospital or other settings, or
beneficiaries' taking advantage of new Medicare-covered services.
The percentage of beneficiaries reported having major difficulty in
accessing care remained relatively constant over the study period at about 7
percent. Beneficiaries more likely to have difficulties accessing care were
those who rated their health as poor, were under 65 and disabled, were not
white, and had no supplemental health insurance or had supplemental insurance
from Medicaid.
The study did not gauge the impact of future cuts, which could be
significant. A recent AMA survey reported that 45 percent of physicians said
they would decrease the number of new Medicare patients they accepted or stop
taking them altogether if a planned 5 percent physician reimbursement cut goes
into effect on January 1, 2007.
"Medicare cannot continue to provide seniors with high-quality health
care while slashing reimbursements to the physicians who care for them,"
said Cecil Wilson, M.D., chair of the AMA Board of Trustees, in a
statement.
Moreover, the study did not look at access to care by medical specialty.
According to Ellen Jaffe, Medicare specialist in APA's office of Healthcare
Systems and Financing, psychiatrists seem to be opting out of Medicare
participation in greater numbers than are physicians in general. Thus, while
beneficiaries in general may not be experiencing an increase in access
difficulties, she noted, psychiatric patients who rely on Medicare may already
be confronting such problems.
The GAO findings appear to run counter to findings reported in March by
MedPAC, the commission that advises Congress on Medicare. For example, MedPAC
found that 25 percent of Medicare patients seeking a new primary care
physician have trouble getting an appointment.
Congress Urged to Act Quickly
The GAO report was released as Congress was considering a reduction of 4
percent to 5 percent to Medicare's physician reimbursement fees. Lawmakers
last year blocked a planned 4.4 percent reduction and now face a similar
decision.
The annual consideration of cuts stems from the 1997 Balanced Budget Act,
which created the sustainable growth rate system that sets a target for
Medicare payments to doctors that factors in inflation (see story below). When
spending increases exceed economic growth, payments to physicians are to be
cut. Unchanged, the system will require approximately 5 percent annual cuts in
physician payments through 2016 to meet program spending targets, according to
federal estimates.
Those cuts are unlikely to occur, however, because lawmakers fear that
payment reductions could add to the record increases in Medicare premiums and
drive physicians from the program.
In late July, Rep. Michael Burgess (R-Texas), an obstetrician, introduced
the Medicare Physician Payment Reform and Quality Improvement Act of 2006 that
would raise Medicare physician fees about 2.8 percent next year. His proposal
would rely more on the inflation measure known as the Medicare economic
index.
"When I practiced medicine, I remember the financial strain when
providing Medicare services cost double what I was being reimbursed," he
said last month at a hearing of the Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on
Health.
The AMA urged Congress to end consideration of the issue for the year by
acting on the issue before Congress recesses in October. Observers said
members of both political parties are open to a revision of the payment system
to avoid the planned cuts, but there is less unity about the source of funds
for a change that would cost billions of dollars.
The GAO research was based in part on reviews of Medicare claims filed from
2000 through 2004 and CMS surveys that asked patients whether finding a
personal provider was "no problem," "a small problem,"
or "a big problem."
The GAO report is posted at
<www.gao.gov/new.items/d061008t.pdf>.
Get information about faster international access.
a>
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2006
American Psychiatric Association.
All rights reserved.
Home
| Search
| Current Issue
| Past Issues
| Subscribe
| All APPI Journals
| Help
| Contact Us
|