Psychiatr News June 2, 2006
Volume 41, Number 11, page 15
© 2006 American Psychiatric Association
Neuroscience Searches for Place In Clinical Practice
Aaron Levin
Everyone agrees that the connection between neuroscience and psychiatry
is vital, but residency programs are still seeking ways to make it relevant to
practicing psychiatrists.
"Developments in neurosciences over the last 50 years have been
phenomenal, but the impact on the practice of psychiatry has been weak,"
maintains Randolph Schiffer, M.D. Schiffer trained as a psychiatrist and as a
neurologist before becoming chair of neurology, neuropsychiatry, and
behavioral science at the Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center in
Lubbock.
Today he's trying to nudge the two fields closer together in the context of
his department's residency training program. It may be slow going, if results
of a survey of residency training directors are any indication.
As part of their APA/GlaxoSmithKline fellowship in 2003-2004, Joshua
Roffman, M.D., and five colleagues created a 28-question survey and sent it to
directors of all psychiatry residency programs in the United States and
Canada. The results appeared in the May American Journal of
Psychiatry.
"Residents know neuroscience is important, but how it will play out
in the future is still a mystery," said Roffman in an interview. He is
now an instructor in psychiatry at Harvard Medical School and a psychiatrist
at Massachusetts General Hospital, where he also holds a postdoctoral
fellowship in neuroimaging and genetics.
The researchers defined neuroscience as including neuroanatomy,
neurodevelopment, neuroimaging, cellular and molecular pathology, genetics,
animal models, neuropsychiatry, and basic pharmacology (such as
neurotransmitter systems, receptors, and neural circuitry), but not clinical
pharmacology.
They received replies from 77 of 182 training directors; Roffman said that
the response rate is similar to that of other surveys and fairly represents
the range of institutions covered.
Neuroscience is now a fixture in residency programs, Roffman and colleagues
concluded. Just 19 percent used a stand-alone approach in which the subject is
presented isolated in time from the rest of the curriculum. About 38 percent
of the programs organized neuroscience training to run parallel with other
courses, and 40 percent used a combination of the two approaches.
"More neuroscientific teaching took place in formal lectures or other
less-clinical settings than in wards, clinics, or case conferences,"
said Roffman. That could change in the next decade as neuroscience research
becomes better integrated with clinical practice, something that residency
training directors seem to expect, even if it happens only modestly in the
present.
Residents and practicing psychiatrists know neuroscience is important, but
they're still trying to figure out how to apply it in their day-to-day
work.
"The role of neuroscience in psychiatry reminds me of opening the
door to the refrigerator," said Schiffer. "You know the light goes
on and off, but you don't know why."
To bridge that gap in his department at Texas Tech, residents are involved
with neuroscience and neurology for all four postgraduate years. That includes
not just lectures but being on call for neurology in their third and fourth
years. Away from the clinic, residents study topics such as intensive care
neurology and neuroimmunology.
"In their third year, we now place them in the memory disorder
research clinic to improve their understanding of cognition," said
Schiffer.
Nationally, neuroscience training accounts for 12 percent of the residents'
curriculum, although the directors thought it should occupy about 20 percent.
More than 8 out of 10 said they expected continued growth over the next five
years, with major increases in time allotted to genetics, neuroimaging, and
cellular and molecular pathology.
Where the time will come from is an interesting question. About 80 percent
of training directors said that psychotherapy training time had remained the
same over the last five years, and 73 percent expected it will do so over the
next five years, though 18 percent said content will increase in that time.
There's no consensus yet on what parts of the curriculum will be reduced to
accommodate an expansion.
"Nearly all respondents believed that neuroscience education is
relevant even for those residents who will ultimately become primarily
therapists or analysts," said the authors.
"Psychotherapy isn't going to die, but neuroscience will provide more
of a context," added Roffman.
"Most psychiatrists go into psychiatry because they want to be
clinicians," said Ronald Krasner, M.D., interim chair of the Department
of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at the Feinberg School of Medicine of
Northwestern University and president of the American Association of Directors
of Psychiatric Residency Training. "They want to know how neuroscience
will help them when they sit down with a patient. Maybe in 25 years, we'll
have ways of using neuroscience in the consulting room, and psychiatric
residency will be completely different. But at the moment, I don't have an MRI
in my office."
Overall though, said Krasner, "this paper pulls us into the
future." There are both immediate and long-term needs for neuroscience
training, but design of residency training programs is not easy to change. For
instance, only about one-third of programs are directly connected to medical
schools, with limited access to academic resources and researchers in
neuroscience for the rest.
Also, programs are controlled not only by their training directors, but
assume their final form after pulling and pushing by department chairs,
medical specialty groups, the AMA, American Hospital Association, Association
of American Medical Colleges, American Council on Graduate Medical Education,
and others.
Graduate medical education is funded in part by Medicare, which imposes
more constraints through a complicated formula filtered through hospitals and
hemmed in by clinical service requirements. As a result, any change will come
slowly, he said.
"Psychiatry isn't at a dead end now, but it is on a narrow
road," said Schiffer. "We need to go down some new roads and one
of those is neuroscience."
"Neuroscience in Psychiatry Training: How Much Do Residents
Need to Know?" is posted at
<http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/163/5/919>.
Get information about faster international access.
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2006
American Psychiatric Association.
All rights reserved.
Home
| Search
| Current Issue
| Past Issues
| Subscribe
| All APPI Journals
| Help
| Contact Us
| 
