
Psychiatric News March 18, 2005
Volume 40 Number 6
© 2005 American Psychiatric Association
p. 4
Coalition Suggests Reforms To Make Medicaid Work
Kate Mulligan
A coalition of mental health organizations offers a lucid way of
untangling the complexities of Medicaid funding.
President George W. Bush proposed more than $60 billion in federal cuts to
the Medicaid program over the next decade in his Fiscal 2006 budget (see story
on page 9).
The National Governors Association has decried any attempts to shift
federal Medicaid costs to the states, but the organization issued a statement
recognizing that the program must be reformed and reshaped.
Changes to Medicaid appear inevitable. Since the program provides more than
half the resources for state and local community mental health services, those
changes have the potential to bring about major improvements to or further
deterioration in the mental health system.
How can advocates sort out and understand the issues that will affect
people with mental illness?
Selby Jacobs, M.D., chair of APA's Committee on Public Funding for
Psychiatric Services, said, "A good starting point is a paper published
by the Campaign for Mental Health Reform [CMHR] last fall. It offers analysis
and background that are helpful in evaluating the implications of proposed
changes."
Chris Koyanagi, policy director for the Bazelon Center for Mental Health
Law, was the lead author of the paper.
APA is a partner of the campaign, which was organized "[to provide]
the mental health community a united voice on federal policy."
"Whither Medicaid? A Briefing Paper on Mental Health Issues in
Medicaid Restructuring" opens with a description of the complexities of
Medicaid eligibility.
For a state to receive federal Medicaid funds, it must cover certain groups
of individuals, who commonly are called the Medicaid "mandatory"
populations. Other populations, the so-called "optional" groups,
may be covered if a state chooses to do so.
"[S]ignificant numbers of people with mental disorders are found in
both categories," according to Koyanagi.
Individuals with mental disorders can be eligible for Medicaid if they
receive federal disability benefits. Over a quarter of those receiving
Supplemental Security Income (SSI) disability benefits, an estimated 1.4
million people in 2001, have psychiatric disabilities.
Generally, SSI recipients are members of Medicaid-mandatory populations.
However, a second group of people with psychiatric disabilities, those who are
eligible for Social Security Disability Insurance, are eligible for Medicare
and eligible for Medicaid only if they have low incomes. That group is known
as dual eligibles.
States vary in their definitions of "low income," but typically
define it as at the federal poverty level or below. They can change their
definition of "low income," thus rendering people eligible or
ineligible.
Individuals can also be eligible for Medicaid if they meet criteria for the
Medically Needy Program. That program offers services if a person's medical
costs are excessive in relation to income.
The Medically Needy Program is an optional service and can be terminated by
the state. Oregon, for example, ended its program, and Gov. Jeb Bush (R) has
announced plans to end the program in Florida.
Services, as well as populations, can be optional or mandatory. Important
optional services for those with mental illness are "intensive community
services to prevent deterioration, maintain or restore functioning, and assist
individuals with daily living; case management; clinical services; and
personal assistance." Coverage for prescription drugs is optional,
although no state has refused to cover them.
Although those services are labeled "optional," they are
essential for the appropriate care of chronically ill psychiatric patients,
Jacobs pointed out.
Some children with emotional disturbances are eligible for Medicaid only
through optional categories or by virtue of their eligibility for the State
Children's Health Insurance Program. In either case, a state can render them
ineligible by changing eligibility standards or by ceasing to fund optional
services.
Koyanagi identified policy changes that would likely be detrimental.
- Altering Medicaid's basic structure to create a block grant that gives
states a capped amount of resources. A state would still be required to
provide mandatory services to mandatory populations, but could provide
optional populations with reduced benefits and offer different packages to
different groups.
- Permitting waivers that allow a state flexibility in how it runs its
Medicaid program, in return for an agreement that the federal contribution can
be capped. As a result, optional services and populations might be
dropped.
- Eliminating the mandate that children receive all medically necessary
services. A benefit package modeled on insurance policies has been proposed.
These policies, however, typically have drastic limits on covered mental
health services and would be highly inappropriate for children with serious
mental disorders, who are disproportionately represented in Medicaid.
- Cutting the federal share of costs for the program as a whole or for
specific segments of it.
The debate about the future of the program also provides an opportunity to
advocate for changes that could help low-income people with mental
illness.
Koyanagi described specific policies that could improve services provided
through Medicaid (see box on page
4).
Jacobs said, "The [CMHR] paper could be a valuable resource for APA's
newly formed Medicaid Advisory Group. We will hold our first official meeting
at the annual meeting in May."
"Whither Medicaid? A Briefing Paper on Mental Health Issues in
Medicaid Restructuring" is posted at
<www.mhreform.org/policy/whithermedicaid.htm>.
Related Articles:
-
Beneficiaries Find Medicare Drug Benefit Wanting
- Mark Moran
Psychiatr News 2005 40: 15-53.
[Full Text]
-
What Can Benefit Medicaid Patients?
Psychiatr News 2005 40: 4.
[Full Text]
-
MH Comes Up Short In Bush's Proposed Budget
- Christine Lehmann
Psychiatr News 2005 40: 9.
[Full Text]
Get information about faster international access.
a>
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005
American Psychiatric Association.
All rights reserved.
Home
| Search
| Current Issue
| Past Issues
| Subscribe
| All APPI Journals
| Help
| Contact Us
|