Psychiatric News
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Psychiatr News September 16, 2005
Volume 40, Number 18, page 36
© 2005 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Search for Related Content
Related Collections
*Related Article

Health Care Economics

Cost to Beneficiaries Declined

Results of a four-year study of the implementation and impact of mental health and substance abuse (MH/SA) parity benefits in the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) program confirm its affordability. These are among the key findings:

  • Costs for MH/SA services increased in FEHB plans, but the increases were similar to changes in plans provided by large employers who offered MH/SA but did not provide parity.
  • Access to and utilization of MH/SA services also increased at a rate similar to increases in the comparison group of large employers that offered MH/SA parity benefits but did not offer parity with other benefits.
  • Out-of-pocket costs for MH/SA services declined more for FEHB beneficiaries than for those in the comparison plans.
  • Two-thirds of the FEHB plans incurred no additional administrative costs due to the parity mandate.
  • There was no evidence that FEHB plans changed benefits for general medical services as a result of the mental health parity policy.
  • For major depressive and substance abuse disorders, the two types of disorders studied, there was little or no effect on quality of care in the FEHB plans.
  • All FEHB plans complied with the MH/SA parity policy, and none refused to participate. Before implementation of the parity policy, 98 percent of the participating plans contained at least one benefit feature that was more restrictive for MH/SA treatment than for general medical care and thus had to be changed to comply with the policy.
  • FEHB plans showed a greater use of carveout vendors after implementation of the parity policy. Requirements for submission of treatment plans increased, but other managed care techniques, such as gatekeeper requirements, did not.


Related Article:

Major Study of Parity Cost Proves Its Affordability
Kate Mulligan
Psychiatr News 2005 40: 1-36. [Full Text]




Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Search for Related Content
Related Collections
*Related Article


Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2005 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org