
Psychiatric News August 20, 2004
Volume 39 Number 16
© 2004 American Psychiatric Association
p. 14
New Law Boosts Private Medicare Plans
Mark Moran
Benefit improvements and premium reductions resulting from increased
payments to private plans in Medicare Advantage may be having a beneficial
effect on enrollment in six communities.
The Medicare Modernization Act (MMA) of 2003 appears to have breathed some
life into the troubled Medicare+Choice programnow called Medicare
Advantagein some communities, according to a report by Mathematica
Policy Research.
Specifically, provisions in the law allowing private plans to receive at
least 100 percent of traditional Medicare payments in the counties where they
provide services appear to be modestly reviving the program in six communities
tracked by Mathematica.
Those communities are Albuquerque, N.M., Baltimore, Detroit, New Orleans,
Orange County, Calif., and Orlando, Fla.
Medicare Advantage provides care under contract to Medicare as an
alternative to traditional Medicare coverage. There are two types of plans
from which beneficiaries can choose: managed care plans (including health
maintenance organizations and preferred provider organizations) and private
fee-for-service plans. In the fee-for-service plans, insurers, rather than
Medicare, decide how much to pay for the services provided to
beneficiaries.
The Medicare Modernization Act also mandates a new method for calculating
annual updates guaranteeing an increase in payments of at least 6.3 percent
this year to private plans that participate in the program. This is up from
the 2 percent increase in the previous two years.
Although market penetration for plans in the six communities has held
steady between March 2003 and March 2004, as of May penetration had increased
slightly in five of the six markets. This pattern suggests that benefit
improvements and premium reductions resulting from the increased payments to
plans may be having a beneficial effect on enrollment.
"The MMA raised payments to plans in 2004 and 2005 to stabilize the
market in anticipation of 2006," said Marsha Gold, Ph.D., a senior
fellow at Mathematica and co-author of the report. "Changes to date show
some beneficial effects from these payments. However, it is too early to tell
whether the additional funding will be sufficient to offset the reactions of
plans, providers, and beneficiaries to earlier withdrawals and erosion of
choice and benefits."
Mathematica, a nonpartisan research firm based in Princeton, N.J.,
Washington, D.C., and Cambridge, Mass., conducts policy research and surveys
for federal and state governments, foundations, and private-sector
clients.
Under the new law, private plans participating in Medicare must use the
increased payments to reduce enrollee premiums or cost sharing, enhance
benefits, stabilize provider networks, and/or put the dollars in a
stabilization fund to offset potential future premium or cost-sharing
increases or benefit cuts.
Plans in four markets chose to use some of the increase to reduce premiums
or cost sharing, and plans in all six markets chose to enhance their benefits
by improving drug coverage, according to the Mathematica report.
Reactions from plan representatives interviewed soon after the MMA was
enacted ranged from cautiously optimistic to enthusiastic about whether the
MMA would help resuscitate the Medicare Advantage market.
The research is based on telephone interviews conducted in January and
February with insurance counselors from state health insurance plans, staff at
Area Agencies on Aging, state aging and insurance officials, and health plan
officials in the six communities.
Respondents were asked about plan and provider changes in the local
Medicare Advantage market, the effect of the MMA on plans in the short and
long term, how beneficiaries responded to the MMA, and how they think it will
affect the Medicare information infrastructure.
The report, "MMA Attempts to Breathe Life Into Troubled
Markets," is posted online at
<www.mathematica-mpr.com/publications/pdfs/opinsights13.pdf>.
Get information about faster international access.
a>
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2004
American Psychiatric Association.
All rights reserved.
Home
| Search
| Current Issue
| Past Issues
| Subscribe
| All APPI Journals
| Help
| Contact Us
|