
Psychiatric News July 16, 2004
Volume 39 Number 14
© 2004 American Psychiatric Association
p. 42
Boundary Problems
M. A. Makhdum, M.D.
Ipswich, England
As I was browsing past issues of Psychiatric News on the Internet,
I read with interest the letter by Dr. Rick Strassman in the February 6, 1998,
issue about his problems in achieving licensure in Canada, specifically
British Columbia. He noted the fact that he was a fully trained psychiatrist
and should have been recognized as such in Canada.
May I mention that his experience is identical to the experience of other
physicians trying to practice in the United States. I am a fully
trainedsome may say highly trainedpsychiatrist who has worked in
the United Kingdom for 14 years. I teach psychiatry to undergraduates and
postgraduates. I am on the faculty of a university and chief of psychiatry for
a county and have all the European degrees that an English-speaking
psychiatrist can acquire, but I can neither practice nor contemplate work in
psychiatry in the United States without taking what is equivalent to basic
medical examinations and other licensing exams.
This is something that APA and regulatory bodies need to review.
Psychiatrists who have been trained in such countries as the United Kingdom,
United States, Canada, France, and Germany should be able to have their
qualifications and experience accredited and recognized mutually.
In this way, we would be able to have the varied experiences we wish to
have, do sabbaticals, and travel throughout the world of psychiatry without
unreasonable restrictions, which are bureaucratic at best and discriminatory
at worst.
I chair one of the largest associations of psychiatrists in the United
Kingdom and would be interested in furthering this discussion with your
readers and associations.
Get information about faster international access.
a>
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2004
American Psychiatric Association.
All rights reserved.
Home
| Search
| Current Issue
| Past Issues
| Subscribe
| All APPI Journals
| Help
| Contact Us
|